Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AIRR vs FTEC: how they differ

Over the year FTEC returned more, +35.7% against +15.0%, and FTEC charges 0.08% against 0.69%.

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AIRR and FTEC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AIRROnly in FTEC
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 6.00%NVIDIA Corp 18.00%
ARGAN INC 4.73%Apple Inc 14.38%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC 4.42%Microsoft Corp 9.54%
MASTEC INC 4.18%Broadcom Inc 5.01%
CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC 4.08%Micron Technology Inc 2.64%
OWENS CORNING 3.90%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC 3.76%Intel Corp 1.99%
EMCOR GROUP INC 3.75%Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

AIRR and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustFidelity
What it isReshoring and manufacturingMSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year+15.0%+35.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.5 pts+18.2 pts
Expense ratio0.69%0.08%
Already in the S&P 5005.5%86.2%
Holdings58282

AIRR in plain words

By weight, 6% of AIRR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. It sits 19.5% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AIRR or FTEC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AIRR returned +15.0% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AIRR or FTEC?
AIRR charges 0.69% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AIRR and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 6% of AIRR and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are AIRR and FTEC the same kind of fund?
No. AIRR is a thematic ETF and FTEC is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AIRR against FTEC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIRR against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AIRR-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources