Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs SPHQ: how they differ
FTEC and SPHQ hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and SPHQ hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 4.51% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 3.54% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 4.10% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 2.80% |
| KLA Corp | 1.09% | 3.27% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 0.92% | 2.03% |
| Western Digital Corp | 0.76% | 2.15% |
| AppLovin Corp | 0.51% | 1.56% |
| Adobe Inc | 0.50% | 1.45% |
| Motorola Solutions Inc | 0.38% | 0.74% |
| Fortinet Inc | 0.31% | 0.85% |
| NetApp Inc | 0.16% | 0.32% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in SPHQ |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 18.00% | Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82% |
| Microsoft Corp 9.54% | Visa Inc. 4.69% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.01% | Mastercard Inc. 4.32% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.64% | General Electric Co. 4.16% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60% | Caterpillar Inc. 3.78% |
| Intel Corp 1.99% | Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40% | Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34% |
| Oracle Corp 1.22% | GE Vernova Inc. 3.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | S&P 500 Quality |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 99.9% |
| Holdings | 282 | 99 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or SPHQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or SPHQ?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources