Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs ONEQ: how they differ
FTEC and ONEQ hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and ONEQ hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 11.24% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 10.04% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 7.32% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 4.64% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 2.38% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 1.84% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 1.25% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 1.04% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 0.87% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 0.78% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 0.78% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.20% | 0.60% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| Oracle Corp 1.22% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| International Business Machines Corp 0.99% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| Arista Networks Inc 0.89% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| Amphenol Corp 0.86% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
| Salesforce Inc 0.77% | META PLATFORMS INC 3.03% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | WALMART INC 2.02% |
| Corning Inc 0.68% | COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.93% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | NETFLIX INC 0.79% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 282 | 1022 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or ONEQ?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources