Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs ITOT: how they differ
FTEC and ITOT hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and ITOT hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 6.64% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 5.82% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 3.80% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 2.45% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 1.78% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 1.30% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 0.90% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 0.79% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 0.74% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 0.64% |
| KLA Corp | 1.09% | 0.54% |
| Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.80% | 0.46% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in ITOT |
|---|---|
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | Alphabet, Inc. 2.87% |
| TE Connectivity PLC 0.34% | Alphabet, Inc. 2.29% |
| Flex Ltd 0.25% | Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.70% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.21% | Tesla, Inc. 1.62% |
| Clearwater Analytics Holdings Inc 0.11% | Eli Lilly & Co. 1.30% |
| JFrog Ltd 0.08% | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.26% |
| Ambarella Inc 0.05% | JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.20% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 282 | 2497 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or ITOT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or ITOT?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 35% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources