Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FENI vs IXUS: how they differ

FENI and IXUS hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FENI and IXUS hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FENI and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFENIIXUS
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC1.33%0.75%
ASTRAZENECA PLC0.82%0.69%
SHELL PLC1.00%0.61%
TOTALENERGIES SE0.65%0.43%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC1.09%0.32%
SAFRAN SA0.57%0.27%
SAP SE0.24%0.41%
GSK PLC0.24%0.25%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD0.22%0.23%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA0.95%0.22%
NATIONAL GRID PLC0.30%0.21%
BAE SYSTEMS PLC0.51%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FENIOnly in IXUS
ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04%
NESTLE SA 1.77%ASML Holding N.V. 1.32%
SIEMENS AG 1.63%SK hynix Inc. 1.15%
TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91%
ABB LTD 1.34%Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67%
IBERDROLA SA 1.23%Novartis AG 0.66%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%Nestle S.A. 0.61%
UBS GROUP AG 1.22%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FENI and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isEnhanced InternationalCore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.9 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings3924185

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FENI or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FENI or IXUS?
FENI charges 0.28% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FENI and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FENI and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FENI against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against IXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FENI-IXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources