Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs FENI: how they differ

ACWX and FENI hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Fidelity Enhanced International ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and FENI hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWX and FENI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWXFENI
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC0.86%1.33%
ASTRAZENECA PLC0.81%0.82%
SHELL PLC0.71%1.00%
TOTALENERGIES SE0.51%0.65%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC0.37%1.09%
SAFRAN SA0.31%0.57%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA0.26%0.95%
SAP SE0.48%0.24%
NATIONAL GRID PLC0.24%0.30%
GSK PLC0.29%0.24%
BAE SYSTEMS PLC0.23%0.51%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD0.23%0.22%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWXOnly in FENI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69%ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.54%NESTLE SA 1.77%
SK hynix Inc. 1.33%SIEMENS AG 1.63%
Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07%TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79%ABB LTD 1.34%
Novartis AG 0.77%IBERDROLA SA 1.23%
Nestle S.A. 0.72%BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.69%UBS GROUP AG 1.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ACWX and FENI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isMSCI ACWI ex U.S.Enhanced International
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+1.9 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.28%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings1759392

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or FENI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and FENI returned +19.4%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or FENI?
ACWX charges 0.32% a year and FENI charges 0.28%, so FENI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWX and FENI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of FENI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against FENI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against FENI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-FENI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources