Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs XLY: how they differ
FBCG and XLY hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and XLY hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM INC | 8.43% | 22.24% |
| TESLA INC | 1.45% | 19.66% |
| STARBUCKS CORP | 0.61% | 2.90% |
| CARVANA CO | 0.51% | 1.17% |
| LOWES COS INC | 0.48% | 3.08% |
| TJX COMPANIES INC | 0.39% | 3.93% |
| CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC | 0.33% | 1.09% |
| DOORDASH INC | 0.27% | 1.74% |
| HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC | 0.23% | 1.87% |
| MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC/MD | 0.19% | 2.02% |
| NIKE INC | 0.17% | 1.23% |
| HOME DEPOT INC | 0.17% | 5.83% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.62% | McDonald's Corp 4.16% |
| APPLE INC 9.64% | Booking Holdings Inc 3.44% |
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 1.97% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% | O'Reilly Automotive Inc 1.90% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | General Motors Co 1.73% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | Airbnb Inc 1.49% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Ford Motor Co 1.35% |
| NETFLIX INC 2.23% | eBay Inc 1.24% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 47 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and XLY returned −4.1%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or XLY?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources