Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs VXUS: how they differ

FBCG and VXUS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VXUS returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VXUS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and VXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGVXUS
SUNCOR ENERGY INC0.12%0.19%
CELESTICA INC0.88%0.11%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD0.08%0.22%
CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD0.07%0.18%
FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD0.08%0.04%
ARITZIA INC0.39%0.02%
IAMGOLD CORP0.09%0.00%
SHOPIFY INC0.25%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in VXUS
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.97%
APPLE INC 9.64%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.67%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%ASML Holding NV 1.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%SK hynix Inc 1.14%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.89%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.74%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.69%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%AstraZeneca PLC 0.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FBCG and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isBlue Chip GrowthTotal International Stock
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts+4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%0.0%
Holdings2148775

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VXUS in plain words

VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so VXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VXUS?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so VXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against VXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources