Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or USFR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and USFR returned +4.1%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or USFR?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so USFR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs USFR: how they differ

FBCG and USFR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in USFR
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.04%
APPLE INC 9.64%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.01%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.00%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 15.95%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FBCG and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	WisdomTree
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	+4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	−13.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.15%
Holdings	214	4

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USFR in plain words

USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or USFR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and USFR returned +4.1%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or USFR?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so USFR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against USFR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against USFR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-USFR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources