Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs SPHQ: how they differ

FBCG and SPHQ hold 11% of their weight in the same names.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SPHQ hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGSPHQ
APPLE INC9.64%4.51%
APPLOVIN CORP1.26%1.56%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP1.19%2.15%
GE VERNOVA INC0.82%3.15%
MASTERCARD INC0.81%4.32%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.69%2.28%
GE AEROSPACE0.40%4.16%
TJX COMPANIES INC0.39%1.79%
VISA INC0.27%4.69%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.21%4.10%
CATERPILLAR INC0.16%3.78%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.13%4.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%Merck & Co., Inc. 2.87%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%Applied Materials, Inc. 2.80%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%QUALCOMM Inc. 2.03%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Eaton Corp. PLC 1.65%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%Adobe Inc. 1.45%
NETFLIX INC 2.23%Progressive Corp. (The) 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FBCG and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityInvesco
What it isBlue Chip GrowthS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%99.9%
Holdings21499

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SPHQ?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources