Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs SDY: how they differ

FBCG and SDY hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SDY hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGSDY
LOWES COS INC0.48%0.74%
ABBVIE INC0.42%1.63%
TARGET CORP0.42%1.55%
MICROSOFT CORP5.20%0.36%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON0.23%1.00%
CARDINAL HEALTH INC0.20%0.47%
CUMMINS INC0.20%0.69%
NIKE INC0.17%1.15%
CATERPILLAR INC0.16%0.47%
EXXON MOBIL CORP0.14%0.93%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.13%0.20%
CENCORA INC0.12%0.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in SDY
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
APPLE INC 9.64%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Automatic Data Processing Inc 1.54%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%Edison International 1.45%
NETFLIX INC 2.23%Sysco Corp 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isBlue Chip GrowthSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%84.6%
Holdings214155

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and SDY returned +11.0%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SDY?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so SDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources