Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs ONEQ: how they differ

FBCG and ONEQ hold 55% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and ONEQ hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGONEQ
NVIDIA CORP14.62%11.24%
APPLE INC9.64%10.04%
AMAZON.COM INC8.43%6.37%
MICROSOFT CORP5.20%7.32%
ALPHABET INC9.10%4.85%
BROADCOM INC3.74%4.64%
META PLATFORMS INC3.90%3.03%
TESLA INC1.45%3.58%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC0.82%2.38%
NETFLIX INC2.23%0.79%
SANDISK CORP/DE0.82%0.55%
APPLOVIN CORP1.26%0.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in ONEQ
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%ALPHABET INC 4.48%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%WALMART INC 2.02%
CELESTICA INC 0.88%INTEL CORP 1.25%
GE VERNOVA INC 0.82%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.04%
MASTERCARD INC 0.81%APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.78%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.67%TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. 0.60%
BOEING CO 0.63%QUALCOMM INC 0.58%
WELLTOWER INC 0.58%LINDE PLC 0.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FBCG and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityFidelity
What it isBlue Chip GrowthNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.21%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%87.4%
Holdings2141022

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or ONEQ?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 55% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources