Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs IWB: how they differ
FBCG and IWB hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IWB hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 14.62% | 6.73% |
| APPLE INC | 9.64% | 6.03% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.20% | 4.00% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 8.43% | 3.33% |
| ALPHABET INC | 9.10% | 3.00% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.74% | 2.54% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.90% | 1.79% |
| TESLA INC | 1.45% | 1.77% |
| ELI LILLY and CO | 2.25% | 1.38% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 0.82% | 1.88% |
| MASTERCARD INC | 0.81% | 0.60% |
| SANDISK CORP/DE | 0.82% | 0.48% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12% | ALPHABET INC. 2.42% |
| CELESTICA INC 0.88% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.34% |
| SHARKNINJA INC 0.67% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26% |
| FTAI AVIATION LTD 0.49% | INTEL CORPORATION 0.88% |
| ARITZIA INC 0.39% | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 0.83% |
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.38% | WALMART INC. 0.72% |
| SNAP INC 0.31% | CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 0.67% |
| BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.29% | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.54% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 214 | 1024 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IWB returned +16.7%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or IWB?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 45% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against IWB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-IWB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources