Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs ILF: how they differ
FBCG and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FBCG | Only in ILF |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.62% | VALE S.A. 8.48% |
| APPLE INC 9.64% | Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25% |
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% | Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | CREDICORP LTD. 4.26% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Latin America 40 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +33.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | +15.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.47% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 45 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or ILF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or ILF?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ILF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against ILF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-ILF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources