Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs FTEC: how they differ
FBCG and FTEC hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and FTEC hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 14.62% | 18.00% |
| APPLE INC | 9.64% | 14.38% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.20% | 9.54% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.74% | 5.01% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 0.82% | 2.64% |
| SANDISK CORP/DE | 0.82% | 0.80% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 1.19% | 0.76% |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.03% | 0.75% |
| APPLOVIN CORP | 1.26% | 0.51% |
| ORACLE CORP | 0.49% | 1.22% |
| MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC | 1.03% | 0.44% |
| LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 0.82% | 0.39% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in FTEC |
|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | Intel Corp 1.99% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.66% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | Applied Materials Inc 1.45% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Texas Instruments Inc 1.20% |
| NETFLIX INC 2.23% | International Business Machines Corp 0.99% |
| TESLA INC 1.45% | Analog Devices Inc 0.95% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12% | QUALCOMM Inc 0.92% |
| CELESTICA INC 0.88% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | MSCI Information Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +35.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | +18.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 86.2% |
| Holdings | 214 | 282 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or FTEC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or FTEC?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources