Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or GLDM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWJ vs GLDM: how they differ

EWJ is an equity index fund and GLDM a commodity fund, and over the year EWJ returned more, +26.5% against +19.4%.

iShares MSCI Japan ETF and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust.

EWJ and GLDM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF	GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI Japan	Gold MiniShares
Total return, 1 year	+26.5%	+19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+9.0 pts	+1.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	not published
Holdings	179	not filed

EWJ in plain words

EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 179 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%.

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or GLDM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +26.5% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWJ against GLDM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWJ against GLDM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWJ-GLDM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources