Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AOR vs EWJ: how they differ

AOR and EWJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWJ returned more over the year.

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares MSCI Japan ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and EWJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AOROnly in EWJ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 4.08%
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09%TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION 3.45%
iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02%SoftBank Group Corp. 3.37%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29%Tokyo Electron Limited 2.90%
iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57%Hitachi, Ltd. 2.86%
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99%Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 2.58%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96%Sony Group Corporation 2.56%
ADVANTEST CORPORATION 2.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AOR and EWJ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore 60/40 Balanced AllocationMSCI Japan
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+26.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+9.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.49%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings7179

AOR in plain words

AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

EWJ in plain words

EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 179 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or EWJ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and EWJ returned +26.5%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AOR or EWJ?
AOR charges 0.15% a year and EWJ charges 0.49%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and EWJ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 0% of EWJ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOR against EWJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against EWJ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-EWJ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources