Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs ONEQ: how they differ
EEM and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EEM | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| PDD Holdings Inc. | 0.47% | 0.12% |
| H World Group Limited | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| Kanzhun Ltd | 0.04% | 0.01% |
| Legend Biotech Corp | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| OZON MKPAO | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Only in EEM | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| SK hynix Inc. 6.65% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.62% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Emerging markets | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 1245 | 1022 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or ONEQ?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources