Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs FBCG: how they differ
EEM and FBCG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EEM | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Legend Biotech Corp | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Only in EEM | Only in FBCG |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28% | NVIDIA CORP 14.62% |
| SK hynix Inc. 6.65% | APPLE INC 9.64% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% | ALPHABET INC 9.10% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% | AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.62% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% | META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% | BROADCOM INC 3.74% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85% | ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Emerging markets | Blue Chip Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +17.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | −0.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.57% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.8% |
| Holdings | 1245 | 214 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or FBCG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or FBCG?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so FBCG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EEM-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources