Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs XLU: how they differ

DGRO and XLU hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and XLU hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and XLU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROXLU
NEXTERA ENERGY INC1.23%12.93%
DUKE ENERGY CORP0.73%6.97%
SOUTHERN COMPANY (THE)0.72%7.62%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC0.45%5.26%
SEMPRA0.38%4.28%
XCEL ENERGY INC0.30%3.54%
ENTERGY CORP0.29%3.71%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC0.28%2.88%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC0.27%2.86%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC0.27%2.69%
DTE ENERGY COMPANY0.22%2.24%
AMEREN CORP0.17%2.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in XLU
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Constellation Energy Corp 5.61%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Dominion Energy Inc 4.24%
APPLE INC 2.94%Exelon Corp 3.37%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%PG&E Corp 2.62%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Edison International 2.02%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%PPL Corp 1.93%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Eversource Energy 1.92%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%FirstEnergy Corp 1.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
XLU
State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthUtilities
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+2.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−15.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%100.0%
Holdings39431

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

XLU in plain words

XLU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%. It sat 10.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or XLU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and XLU returned +2.4%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or XLU?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against XLU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against XLU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-XLU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources