Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs XLP: how they differ

DGRO and XLP hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and XLP hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROXLP
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)2.08%7.46%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC1.94%6.16%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%6.87%
PEPSICO INC1.70%4.34%
WALMART INC0.95%10.84%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC0.61%4.17%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.52%9.06%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY0.34%4.71%
KEURIG DR PEPPER INC0.26%2.90%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY0.23%2.40%
SYSCO CORP0.20%2.60%
KROGER COMPANY (THE)0.17%2.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in XLP
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%
APPLE INC 2.94%Target Corp 3.87%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Kenvue Inc 2.39%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Kimberly-Clark Corp 2.37%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Hershey Co/The 1.69%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Dollar General Corp 1.65%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Dollar Tree Inc 1.43%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%100.0%
Holdings39434

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and XLP returned +6.3%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or XLP?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources