Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs XLB: how they differ

DGRO and XLB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and XLB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and XLB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROXLB
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC0.39%4.63%
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY (THE)0.15%4.95%
NUCOR CORP0.15%3.88%
ECOLAB INC0.15%4.73%
PPG INDUSTRIES INC0.14%3.62%
CORTEVA INC0.11%4.97%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC0.08%3.73%
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY0.06%4.72%
AVERY DENNISON CORP0.06%1.67%
MOSAIC COMPANY (THE)0.05%0.90%
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC0.04%4.55%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in XLB
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Linde PLC 14.08%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Newmont Corp 5.85%
APPLE INC 2.94%Freeport-McMoRan Inc 5.31%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%CRH PLC 4.67%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Smurfit Westrock PLC 3.25%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Packaging Corp of America 2.83%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%International Flavors & Fragrances Inc 2.71%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%International Paper Co 2.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
XLB
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthMaterials
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%100.0%
Holdings39426

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

XLB in plain words

XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or XLB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and XLB returned +12.0%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or XLB?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against XLB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources