Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs XHB: how they differ

DGRO and XHB hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and XHB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROXHB
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)1.90%3.28%
LOWE'S COMPANIES INC0.57%3.03%
CARRIER GLOBAL CORP0.19%3.20%
D.R. HORTON INC0.11%3.29%
OWENS CORNING0.07%4.10%
MASCO CORP0.07%3.41%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC0.07%3.34%
PULTEGROUP INC0.04%3.44%
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC0.04%3.37%
CARLISLE COMPANIES INC0.04%3.28%
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC0.02%3.40%
TOLL BROTHERS INC0.02%3.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in XHB
BROADCOM INC 3.25%KB Home 3.56%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Builders FirstSource Inc 3.56%
APPLE INC 2.94%Meritage Homes Corp 3.53%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Champion Homes Inc 3.34%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Trane Technologies PLC 3.25%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Cavco Industries Inc 3.23%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Allegion plc 3.22%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%NVR Inc 3.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthSPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+17.4%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%45.7%
Holdings39435

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and XHB returned −16.6%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or XHB?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources