Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs VONG: how they differ

DGRO and VONG hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and VONG hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROVONG
BROADCOM INC3.25%5.78%
APPLE INC2.94%11.97%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%8.98%
ABBVIE INC2.53%1.16%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.14%2.67%
VISA INC1.05%1.57%
ORACLE CORP0.81%1.15%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)1.90%0.73%
MASTERCARD INC0.61%1.20%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.52%1.28%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%0.45%
AMGEN INC1.11%0.40%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in VONG
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Tesla Inc 3.48%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%Alphabet Inc 3.15%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 1.75%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.73%Netflix Inc 1.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRO and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore Dividend GrowthRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%95.6%
Holdings394387

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and VONG returned +7.2%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or VONG?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources