Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs VLUE: how they differ

DGRO and VLUE hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and VLUE hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROVLUE
BANK OF AMERICA CORP1.84%1.88%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%4.97%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.75%1.57%
CITIGROUP INC1.12%1.94%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY1.29%1.12%
QUALCOMM INC1.10%1.80%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.53%0.66%
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC (THE)0.66%0.46%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC0.45%0.63%
CIGNA GROUP (THE)0.38%0.84%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC0.38%3.67%
FEDEX CORP0.32%1.69%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in VLUE
BROADCOM INC 3.25%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
APPLE INC 2.94%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%AT&T INC. 2.53%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.89%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%FORD MOTOR COMPANY 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DGRO and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%96.9%
Holdings394148

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or VLUE?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources