Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs USMV: how they differ

DGRO and USMV hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and USMV hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROUSMV
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%1.81%
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%1.60%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%1.56%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.64%1.44%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%1.20%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.75%1.18%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.28%1.11%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)2.08%1.11%
MCDONALD'S CORP1.05%1.25%
PEPSICO INC1.70%1.02%
VISA INC1.05%0.94%
WALMART INC0.95%0.88%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in USMV
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%Chubb Limited 1.50%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 1.29%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%
MORGAN STANLEY 1.28%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.42%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.19%VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED 1.36%
CITIGROUP INC 1.12%WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC. 1.28%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.99%NEWMONT CORPORATION 1.18%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.79%T-MOBILE US, INC. 1.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DGRO and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%94.8%
Holdings394170

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and USMV returned +6.6%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or USMV?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources