Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs SPYD: how they differ

DGRO and SPYD hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and SPYD hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and SPYD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROSPYD
PEPSICO INC1.70%1.11%
DUKE ENERGY CORP0.73%1.28%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.53%1.44%
PHILLIPS 660.50%1.44%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.35%1.28%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY0.23%1.36%
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC0.17%1.42%
EVERGY INC0.14%1.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in SPYD
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Iron Mountain Inc 1.62%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Franklin Resources Inc 1.57%
APPLE INC 2.94%CVS Health Corp 1.53%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Edison International 1.48%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Target Corp 1.48%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%APA Corp 1.48%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Viatris Inc 1.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and SPYD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%100.0%
Holdings39478

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or SPYD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or SPYD?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against SPYD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources