Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs SCHG: how they differ

DGRO and SCHG hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and SCHG hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROSCHG
BROADCOM INC3.25%4.55%
APPLE INC2.94%9.84%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%7.18%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.32%1.20%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.14%3.06%
VISA INC1.05%1.92%
MASTERCARD INC0.61%1.41%
BLACKROCK INC0.72%0.53%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.52%1.48%
KLA CORP0.27%0.88%
S&P GLOBAL INC0.25%0.45%
PHILLIPS 660.50%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in SCHG
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%NVIDIA Corp 11.02%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Alphabet Inc 4.76%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Tesla Inc 3.92%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Alphabet Inc 3.78%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%Meta Platforms Inc 3.46%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%Netflix Inc 1.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRO and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isCore Dividend GrowthU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%95.4%
Holdings394193

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or SCHG?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources