Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs QUAL: how they differ

DGRO and QUAL hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and QUAL hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROQUAL
APPLE INC2.94%6.28%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%5.05%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.64%1.92%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.14%2.92%
QUALCOMM INC1.10%1.42%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.75%1.08%
VISA INC1.05%3.09%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.32%1.03%
WALMART INC0.95%1.23%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)2.08%0.93%
CATERPILLAR INC0.79%2.52%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%0.75%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in QUAL
BROADCOM INC 3.25%NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%ALPHABET INC. 2.54%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%ALPHABET INC. 2.12%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%NETFLIX, INC. 2.00%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%SLB N.V. 1.56%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.73%ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. 1.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DGRO and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%98.9%
Holdings394121

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or QUAL?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources