Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs MGK: how they differ

DGRO and MGK hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and MGK hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and MGK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROMGK
BROADCOM INC3.25%4.28%
APPLE INC2.94%12.19%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%7.52%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.14%3.41%
VISA INC1.05%1.82%
ORACLE CORP0.81%0.95%
MASTERCARD INC0.61%1.47%
TJX COMPANIES INC (THE)0.42%0.70%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC0.38%1.13%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.35%1.93%
AMPHENOL CORP0.29%0.89%
KLA CORP0.27%1.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in MGK
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%NVIDIA Corp 13.29%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Alphabet Inc 5.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Alphabet Inc 4.67%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Amazon.com Inc 4.47%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Meta Platforms Inc 4.08%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Tesla Inc 3.93%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.20%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%Sandisk Corp 1.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore Dividend GrowthMega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+14.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−2.6 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%99.2%
Holdings39456

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or MGK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and MGK returned +14.9%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or MGK?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and MGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 99% of MGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against MGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against MGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-MGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources