Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs MDY: how they differ

DGRO and MDY hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and MDY hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROMDY
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC0.13%0.33%
EAST WEST BANCORP INC0.12%0.49%
OVINTIV INC0.09%0.40%
DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC0.08%0.41%
OGE ENERGY CORP0.08%0.28%
DT MIDSTREAM INC0.08%0.41%
JEFFERIES FINANCIAL GROUP INC0.07%0.23%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC0.07%0.30%
OWENS CORNING0.07%0.35%
UNUM GROUP0.07%0.36%
RELIANCE INC0.07%0.53%
ZIONS BANCORP NA0.06%0.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in MDY
BROADCOM INC 3.25%TWILIO INC 0.86%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
APPLE INC 2.94%MKS INC 0.83%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%ATI INC 0.74%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings394400

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and MDY returned +13.0%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or MDY?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources