Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs JEPQ: how they differ

Over the year JEPQ returned more, +18.9% against +17.4%, and DGRO charges 0.08% against 0.35%.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and JEPQ hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and JEPQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROJEPQ
APPLE INC2.94%5.83%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%3.90%
BROADCOM INC3.25%2.16%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%1.34%
WALMART INC0.95%1.79%
PEPSICO INC1.70%0.67%
QUALCOMM INC1.10%0.59%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.54%1.12%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.52%1.16%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC0.61%0.42%
ABBVIE INC2.53%0.41%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC0.38%1.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in JEPQ
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%NVIDIA Corp. 6.68%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Micron Technology, Inc. 5.58%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Alphabet, Inc. 5.05%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.87%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.67%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%Tesla, Inc. 2.39%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.38%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 1.75%Seagate Technology Holdings plc 1.93%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and JEPQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundIncome ETF
IssueriSharesJPMorgan
What it isCore Dividend Growthcovered call, vs QQQ
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+23.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−4.1 pts
Cash paid, 1 yearnot an income fund12.0%
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Holdings394not filed

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

JEPQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, JEPQ paid 12.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or JEPQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and JEPQ returned +18.9%, so JEPQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or JEPQ?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and JEPQ charges 0.35%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are DGRO and JEPQ the same kind of fund?
No. DGRO is an index ETF and JEPQ is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against JEPQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against JEPQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-JEPQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources