Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IWM: how they differ

DGRO and IWM hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IWM returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IWM hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IWM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIWM
BLACK HILLS CORP0.05%0.18%
SPIRE INC (US)0.04%0.14%
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP0.04%0.18%
NORTHWESTERN ENERGY GROUP INC0.04%0.14%
ONE GAS INC0.04%0.15%
TXNM ENERGY INC0.04%0.18%
RADIAN GROUP INC0.04%0.16%
HOME BANCSHARES INC0.03%0.17%
UMB FINANCIAL CORP0.03%0.33%
MAGNOLIA OIL & GAS CORP0.03%0.15%
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES CORP0.03%0.12%
KONTOOR BRANDS INC0.03%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IWM
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Hut 8 Corp. 0.37%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Viasat, Inc. 0.35%
APPLE INC 2.94%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Argan, Inc. 0.34%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%JFrog Ltd. 0.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Riot Platforms, Inc. 0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+21.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.19%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings3942014

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IWM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IWM?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IWM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IWM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-IWM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources