Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IJT: how they differ

DGRO and IJT hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IJT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IJT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIJT
RADIAN GROUP INC0.04%0.28%
KONTOOR BRANDS INC0.03%0.25%
VICTORY CAPITAL HOLDINGS INC0.03%0.28%
STEPSTONE GROUP INC0.02%0.33%
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES INC0.02%0.24%
COHEN & STEERS INC0.02%0.11%
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC0.02%0.23%
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC0.01%0.76%
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS INC0.01%0.29%
FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC0.01%0.25%
GRIFFON CORP0.01%0.25%
BANCFIRST CORP0.01%0.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IJT
BROADCOM INC 3.25%FormFactor, Inc. 1.38%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Viasat, Inc. 1.35%
APPLE INC 2.94%Argan, Inc. 1.24%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Alkermes plc 0.97%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings394347

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IJT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IJT?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IJT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IJT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-IJT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources