Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IJR: how they differ

DGRO and IJR hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IJR hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IJR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIJR
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC0.04%0.33%
POOL CORP0.04%0.38%
RADIAN GROUP INC0.04%0.23%
MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC0.03%0.25%
MAGNOLIA OIL & GAS CORP0.03%0.26%
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES CORP0.03%0.23%
KONTOOR BRANDS INC0.03%0.23%
VICTORY CAPITAL HOLDINGS INC0.03%0.22%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS INC0.02%0.23%
KORN FERRY0.02%0.19%
STEPSTONE GROUP INC0.02%0.17%
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES INC0.02%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IJR
BROADCOM INC 3.25%FORMFACTOR INC 0.69%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%VIASAT INC 0.68%
APPLE INC 2.94%MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%ARGAN INC 0.62%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.61%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and IJR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P SmallCap 600
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+19.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+2.4 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings394603

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IJR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IJR returned +19.9%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IJR?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IJR charges 0.06%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IJR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IJR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IJR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IJR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-IJR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources