Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs GRNY: how they differ

DGRO and GRNY hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and GRNY hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROGRNY
BROADCOM INC3.25%2.94%
APPLE INC2.94%2.40%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%2.38%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY3.05%2.33%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.19%2.27%
AMGEN INC1.11%2.15%
CATERPILLAR INC0.79%2.69%
UNION PACIFIC CORP0.78%2.39%
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC (THE)0.66%2.21%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.52%2.33%
EATON CORP PLC0.44%2.56%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY0.42%2.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in GRNY
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%GE Vernova Inc 3.05%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Amazon.com Inc 3.02%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Strategy Inc 3.01%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Alphabet Inc 2.96%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%Arista Networks Inc 2.88%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%Netflix Inc 2.82%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DGRO and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFundstrat
What it isCore Dividend GrowthFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%97.0%
Holdings39440

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or GRNY?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources