Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs GPIX: how they differ

Over the year DGRO and GPIX finished level, +17.4% against +17.5%, and DGRO charges 0.08% against 0.29%.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and GPIX hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and GPIX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROGPIX
APPLE INC2.94%6.47%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%3.90%
BROADCOM INC3.25%2.80%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY3.05%1.36%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.14%1.48%
VISA INC1.05%0.99%
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%0.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.64%0.95%
WALMART INC0.95%0.83%
CATERPILLAR INC0.79%0.78%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%0.73%
ABBVIE INC2.53%0.71%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in GPIX
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.19%NVIDIA CORP 7.33%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 0.61%ALPHABET INC 4.37%
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0.18%AMAZON.COM INC 3.39%
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC 0.13%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
EAST WEST BANCORP INC 0.12%TESLA INC 1.89%
CHENIERE ENERGY INC 0.12%META PLATFORMS INC 1.67%
OVINTIV INC 0.09%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 1.51%
BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC 0.08%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and GPIX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundIncome ETF
IssueriSharesGoldman Sachs
What it isCore Dividend Growthcovered call, vs SPY
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts0.0 pts
Cash paid, 1 yearnot an income fund8.8%
Expense ratio0.08%0.29%
Holdings394not filed

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

GPIX in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or GPIX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and GPIX returned +17.5%, so GPIX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or GPIX?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and GPIX charges 0.29%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are DGRO and GPIX the same kind of fund?
No. DGRO is an index ETF and GPIX is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against GPIX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against GPIX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-GPIX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources