Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs DYNF: how they differ

DGRO and DYNF hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and DYNF hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and DYNF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRODYNF
BROADCOM INC3.25%3.25%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY3.05%3.59%
APPLE INC2.94%7.75%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%5.35%
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%1.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.64%1.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%2.76%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP1.84%1.59%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.19%1.21%
CITIGROUP INC1.12%1.27%
WALMART INC0.95%1.42%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.14%0.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in DYNF
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 1.80%NVIDIA Corp 8.62%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 1.75%Amazon.com Inc 4.42%
PEPSICO INC 1.70%Alphabet Inc 2.87%
AMGEN INC 1.11%Meta Platforms Inc 2.50%
QUALCOMM INC 1.10%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.99%Alphabet Inc 2.10%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES 0.79%Tesla Inc 1.74%
ACCENTURE PLC 0.76%Micron Technology Inc 1.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DGRO and DYNF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthU.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+20.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.26%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%98.8%
Holdings394187

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or DYNF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and DYNF returned +20.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or DYNF?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and DYNF charges 0.26%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and DYNF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 99% of DYNF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against DYNF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against DYNF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-DYNF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources