Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs DVY: how they differ

DGRO and DVY hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and DVY returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Select Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and DVY hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and DVY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRODVY
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC1.94%1.02%
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%0.99%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC1.23%0.98%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%0.92%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.75%0.87%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.28%0.83%
MCDONALD'S CORP1.05%0.69%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.78%0.66%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC0.61%1.22%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.53%1.25%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP0.47%0.57%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC0.45%1.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in DVY
BROADCOM INC 3.25%ALTRIA GROUP INC 2.30%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%PFIZER INC 2.22%
APPLE INC 2.94%T. ROWE PRICE GROUP INC 2.03%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.85%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 1.85%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%ONEOK INC 1.84%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%HP INC 1.61%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%EDISON INTERNATIONAL 1.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DGRO and DVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+18.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.38%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%80.5%
Holdings394100

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

DVY in plain words

DVY is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 18.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or DVY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and DVY returned +18.0%, so DVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or DVY?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and DVY charges 0.38%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and DVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 80% of DVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against DVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against DVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-DVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources