Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs DIVO: how they differ

Over the year DGRO returned more, +17.4% against +16.3%, and DGRO charges 0.08% against 0.56%.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and DIVO hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and DIVO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRODIVO
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY3.05%5.05%
APPLE INC2.94%5.30%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%5.12%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)1.90%3.29%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%2.71%
MERCK & COMPANY INC1.75%3.49%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.28%3.90%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.19%4.78%
AMGEN INC1.11%4.36%
VISA INC1.05%3.50%
MCDONALD'S CORP1.05%3.00%
WALMART INC0.95%3.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in DIVO
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF 4.48%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Chevron Corp 4.12%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.73%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 2.34%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%NVIDIA Corp 2.25%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Norfolk Southern Corp 2.17%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%Freeport-McMoRan Inc 2.00%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%Verizon Communications Inc 1.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and DIVO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundIncome ETF
IssueriSharesAmplify
What it isCore Dividend Growthdividend stocks with call overlay, vs SPY
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−1.2 pts
Cash paid, 1 yearnot an income fund6.8%
Expense ratio0.08%0.56%
Holdings394not filed

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

DIVO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.9%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or DIVO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and DIVO returned +16.3%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or DIVO?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and DIVO charges 0.56%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are DGRO and DIVO the same kind of fund?
No. DGRO is an index ETF and DIVO is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against DIVO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against DIVO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-DIVO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources