Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs DGRW: how they differ

DGRO and DGRW hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and DGRW hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and DGRW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRODGRW
APPLE INC2.94%3.87%
MICROSOFT CORP2.92%5.75%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.64%2.34%
BROADCOM INC3.25%2.34%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC2.32%2.92%
ABBVIE INC2.53%2.07%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)1.90%2.81%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%2.88%
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%1.59%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%1.44%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)2.08%1.40%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.28%1.59%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in DGRW
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%NVIDIA CORP 7.95%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%META PLATFORMS INC 2.97%
PEPSICO INC 1.70%ALPHABET INC 2.32%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 1.29%ALPHABET INC 2.31%
MORGAN STANLEY 1.28%T-MOBILE US INC 1.48%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.23%CHEVRON CORP 1.38%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.19%CORNING INC 1.23%
CITIGROUP INC 1.12%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesWisdomTree
What it isCore Dividend GrowthU.S. Quality Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.28%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%96.7%
Holdings394197

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or DGRW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and DGRW returned +12.4%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or DGRW?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and DGRW charges 0.28%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and DGRW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 97% of DGRW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against DGRW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against DGRW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-DGRW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources