Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or ITOT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DBMF or ITOT?

DBMF charges 0.85% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DBMF vs ITOT: how they differ

DBMF and ITOT are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +17.2%.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

DBMF and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iMGP	iShares
What it is	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy	Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year	+25.4%	+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+7.9 pts	−0.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.03%
Holdings	not filed	2497

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DBMF or ITOT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBMF returned +25.4% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or ITOT?: DBMF charges 0.85% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DBMF-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources