Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs XLF: how they differ

COWZ and XLF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in XLF
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Visa Inc 7.51%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%Mastercard Inc 5.47%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Morgan Stanley 3.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

COWZ and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerState Street
What it isUS Cash Cows 100Financials
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%100.0%
Holdings10076

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and XLF returned +7.6%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or XLF?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources