Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs VIG: how they differ

COWZ and VIG hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VIG hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZVIG
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%0.87%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.84%0.74%
Intuit Inc1.63%0.49%
McKesson Corp1.79%0.45%
Automatic Data Processing Inc1.31%0.39%
Colgate-Palmolive Co1.10%0.31%
Cencora Inc1.03%0.27%
Cardinal Health Inc1.62%0.21%
DR Horton Inc1.21%0.19%
Roper Technologies Inc0.78%0.17%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co1.55%0.16%
ResMed Inc0.50%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in VIG
Altria Group Inc 2.21%Broadcom Inc 5.21%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Apple Inc 4.10%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%Microsoft Corp 3.99%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Walmart Inc 2.62%
Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99%Johnson & Johnson 2.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerVanguard
What it isUS Cash Cows 100Dividend growth
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%95.7%
Holdings100332

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and VIG returned +12.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VIG?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources