Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs SPY: how they differ

COWZ and SPY hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and SPY hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and SPY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZSPY
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%0.30%
Verizon Communications Inc1.90%0.27%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.84%0.24%
Uber Technologies Inc2.01%0.23%
AT&T Inc1.84%0.22%
Booking Holdings Inc1.87%0.21%
Pfizer Inc2.00%0.21%
CVS Health Corp2.16%0.20%
Salesforce Inc1.76%0.20%
ConocoPhillips2.17%0.20%
Altria Group Inc2.21%0.19%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co2.03%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in SPY
Accenture PLC 1.68%NVIDIA Corp. 7.52%
Zoom Communications Inc 0.80%Apple, Inc. 6.59%
Coterra Energy Inc 0.63%Microsoft Corp. 4.30%
Tenet Healthcare Corp 0.63%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%
Flex Ltd 0.59%Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%
TechnipFMC PLC 0.58%Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc 0.44%Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%
United Therapeutics Corp 0.41%Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

COWZ and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerState Street
What it isUS Cash Cows 100S&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%100.0%
Holdings100504

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPY in plain words

SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or SPY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and SPY returned +17.5%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or SPY?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and SPY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 100% of SPY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against SPY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against SPY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-SPY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources