Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs IYW: how they differ

COWZ and IYW hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IYW hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZIYW
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%1.18%
Salesforce Inc1.76%0.99%
Intuit Inc1.63%0.65%
Adobe Inc1.75%0.62%
Autodesk Inc0.72%0.31%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.84%0.25%
Roper Technologies Inc0.78%0.23%
Jabil Inc0.55%0.21%
Workday Inc0.75%0.16%
Zoom Communications Inc0.80%0.16%
Cognizant Technology Solutions0.69%0.16%
VeriSign Inc0.39%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in IYW
Altria Group Inc 2.21%NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%APPLE INC. 13.65%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%ALPHABET INC. 7.84%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%ALPHABET INC. 6.34%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.99%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%BROADCOM INC. 3.78%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%
Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPaceriShares
What it isUS Cash Cows 100U.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%95.5%
Holdings100139

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or IYW?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IYW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources