Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs FTEC: how they differ

COWZ and FTEC hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FTEC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and FTEC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZFTEC
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%0.92%
Salesforce Inc1.76%0.77%
Intuit Inc1.63%0.51%
Adobe Inc1.75%0.50%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.84%0.28%
Autodesk Inc0.72%0.28%
Jabil Inc0.55%0.25%
Roper Technologies Inc0.78%0.21%
Twilio Inc0.36%0.20%
Zoom Communications Inc0.80%0.19%
VeriSign Inc0.39%0.17%
Cognizant Technology Solutions0.69%0.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in FTEC
Altria Group Inc 2.21%NVIDIA Corp 18.00%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Apple Inc 14.38%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%Microsoft Corp 9.54%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%Broadcom Inc 5.01%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%Micron Technology Inc 2.64%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Intel Corp 1.99%
Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99%Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerFidelity
What it isUS Cash Cows 100MSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+35.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+18.2 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%86.2%
Holdings100282

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FTEC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or FTEC?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against FTEC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources