Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs FLKR: how they differ

COWZ and FLKR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in FLKR
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%SK HYNIX INC 23.85%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

COWZ and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerFranklin
What it isUS Cash Cows 100FTSE South Korea
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+146.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+128.5 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%0.0%
Holdings100157

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FLKR in plain words

FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FLKR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and FLKR returned +146.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or FLKR?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and FLKR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 0% of FLKR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against FLKR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against FLKR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-FLKR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources