Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs FBCG: how they differ
COWZ and FBCG hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FBCG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 1.84% | 0.69% |
| Target Corp | 1.07% | 0.42% |
| Twilio Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% |
| Delta Air Lines Inc | 1.48% | 0.33% |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc | 0.83% | 0.30% |
| Uber Technologies Inc | 2.01% | 0.21% |
| Cardinal Health Inc | 1.62% | 0.20% |
| McKesson Corp | 1.79% | 0.19% |
| Jabil Inc | 0.55% | 0.16% |
| Salesforce Inc | 1.76% | 0.13% |
| Cencora Inc | 1.03% | 0.12% |
| PACCAR Inc | 0.99% | 0.10% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in FBCG |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | NVIDIA CORP 14.62% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | APPLE INC 9.64% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | ALPHABET INC 9.10% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | BROADCOM INC 3.74% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99% | ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | Fidelity |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Blue Chip Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +17.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | −0.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.57% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 86.8% |
| Holdings | 100 | 214 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FBCG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or FBCG?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources