Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs EEM: how they differ
COWZ and EEM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COWZ | Only in EEM |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | SK hynix Inc. 6.65% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | MediaTek Inc. 1.62% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | iShares |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Emerging markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +32.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | +14.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.72% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 100 | 1245 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or EEM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or EEM?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and EEM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 0% of EEM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against EEM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-EEM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources